Social Care should not be paid for by increase in National Insurance, no increase in taxes on workers.
Why is this tax hike being reported as a given, media doing the job of the government, no exploration of alternatives.
It is also to set up a false dichotomy.
This is not the hard working young supporting the elderly.
Those in care homes with dementia, worked hard, paid their taxes, paid National Insurance, entered into a social contract, we pay our taxes and you look after us when we fall sick, when we get old.
Many who are now retired, worked hard, scrimped and saved to buy a house, built up savings. Why should it then be taken from them to fund social care? They could have lived in a council house, spent every night down at the pub, during the day in the betting shop, not a penny to their name, and all their social care would be paid for.
A large part of the social care budget goes to provide support for disabled, many of who are young, of working age.
And what the young forget, they too will be old one day, and if they stuff themselves with McShit, they will suffer diseases of old age far sooner, dementia, diabetes, heart problems. Type II diabetes used to be known as late onset diabetes, it is now affecting the young.
Social care should not be paid for with hike in taxes on workers, especially when alternatives exist.
- wealth tax
- windfall tax on Big Tech
- windfall tax on pandemic profiteers
- 5% revenue tax on Big Tech
- carbon tax
- plastic tax
- aviation fuel tax
- hike corporation tax
- hike beer tax
- hike excise duty on fuel
- tax on industrial agriculture
- address tax dodging
Revenue tax should also be levied on tax-dodging corporations eg Starbucks. Levied where the revenue is generated.
During the pandemic, the rich have considerable increased their wealth.
Serco was paid billions for a track and trace system that did not work.